After this no longer seems such a radical attempt to establish "peace" in German 30's through the physical annihilation of the Jews as the existing "conflict of the pole." Maybe try and not successful, but a demonstration of how people are used to achieve "Peace" is available. "The ultimate goal for society," sometimes subjugates the will and mind of people to justify even the most atrocious crimes. There is no doubt that the people who most want peace and quiet, usually shout loudest: "Crucify him!". For even more details, read what Samsung says on the issue. Despite the fact that we live in an age of rights, freedoms and common sense, the psychological mechanisms of human thought and action have changed little. Another aspect of-war for resources, which is predictable and inevitable. Needs of humanity, with its number, grow, and natural resources are already limited. Have you ever thought that the war in Iraq was not a success (read: support for the Americans), largely due to the fact that America itself of oil to meet the needs of Americans was enough. Who knows what the outcome would be this campaign, whether oil is really in short supply in the U.S., and the population itself, in a panic.

What then to speak of exhaustion mineral deposits, timber, natural food, drinking water, finally? When your own children are starving, you will justify any violent action of his country and his government, as on foreground are already vital interests and survival. Who can say that it is immoral, if the opposite instinct itself? Even if (it should) take into account the interests and efforts of the international community to combat xenophobia, poverty, crime and disease on a global scale and elimination of conflicts at all local levels, as well as activities related to planning and equal distribution of resources, open-minded and naturally emerges the image of a single world government. Democratic? Well, really does not. Planning, distribution, control, single control device – the key concept of leaving the state totalitarian. Now another question: is this what they want and this is sought by those who argue for "world peace"? I have the courage to answer for them is unlikely. What did they identify ways of establishing this of the global "peace"? Vision only superficial signs of the phenomenon without penetration into the essence of it really does not give just the ignorance of his supporters and is not the illusion of a regular society that nurtures its ignis, and perhaps even poses a direct threat, preparing the platform for the next "great goal of universal"? PSNet nothing wrong with helping the poor, reconcile warring parties, treat patients, but also as a life according to principles of morality is different from preaching morality, and the active assistance neighbor is different from the active creation of new myths.