The new Internet Protocol and data protection of the world assume the Internet addresses, specifically, the IP addresses (IPv4). The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority management (IANA), which is responsible for the worldwide management of the IP addresses, has warned that the IPv4 addresses are soon completely exhausted. Reason is the steady increase of Internet access and the dissemination of IP telephony. IPv4 was admitted in 1980 in operation and makes possible, based on a 32 bit address nearly 4.3 billion combinations. And these addresses are slowly but surely running out.
The new Protocol, IPv6, is already in the starting blocks. IPv6 uses 128-bit, and so, it is possible with IPv6 to assign 340 Undecillion addresses! This quantity is of course absolutely unverbrauchbar and right here data protectors come into conflict. Currently, it is so that the providers assign dynamic IP address. So every time when it dials into the Internet, you get assigned a dynamic IP address until it joins new or assigns the forced separation of a new IP address. An IP address a personal date, it is technically to identify possible the connector holder and owner about it, here there are also still a need for dispute, but this is a separate topic. The IPv6 protocol all IP could stay with static addresses, so one receives at each dial the same IP address.
You want now than users for example, for whatever reason, change its IP address, so this through a disconnect and reconnect no longer possible, it is again the same IP address and privacy advocates criticize that. It is clearly identifiable by this address from data security aspects, this is not really conducive, to later continue to carry out attacks, an attacker must only only the first IP of the affected PC, smaller companies that have so far also dynamic IPs are thus more vulnerable. So far, but probably still not settled whether IPv6 is really statically assigned addresses, so you wait like this be fixed must should. The IPv6 comes to the course is clear, but how the handling of the addresses is handled, is probably still in the stars. Sascha Hasselbach
Gunter Zielinski – accountant from Hamburg informed Germany’s tax law is extremely confusing and often incorrectly applied even by the financial management. The taxpayer is therefore often not otherwise about to enforce as its legitimate interests by means of tax assessment review and appeal procedures. The Hamburg-based tax consultant and lecturer Gunter Zielinski describes how this should be taken. More than one third, issued by the German tax authorities, tax assessment is incorrect. The reasons for this are usually in one of the following circumstances: the tax declaration form or one of its 15 plants was the taxpayer incorrectly filled out. The revenue authority takes different views on the specific tax case.
The collection of data was incomplete or incorrect. The financial management ignores the current case law of the federal application provisions of the Federal Ministry of finance. Once erroneous tax assessments are received, must within one month of opposition raised be. After this period, obtained the tax assessment notice, long-lasting effectiveness regardless of its accuracy, and will no longer be changed. Learn more on the subject from Ali Partovi. Always a comprehensible justification because those are financial officials in a position to edit the facts among the opposition. Without grounds of opposition shall adopt the financial administration sooner or later an opposition decision, with which this is dismissed as unfounded. A new examination of the concerned tax and due to their adopted tax assessment notice the financial authorities, contrary to her from section 367, paragraph 2 not carry AO resulting obligation, usually.
For taxpayers, the need to proceed immediately with a reasoned objection in writing against dubious tax bills stems from the processing practices of financial management. Otherwise, they obstruct the way to enforce their fiscal interests. The vast majority of taxpayers not found their way in the jungle of German tax law. You should a similarly conflict experienced tax advisor entrust about checking tax assessments, and in particular the opposition leadership. Experience and expertise of a tax advisor allow him to confront the representatives of the tax authorities on an equal footing. This, he has not only a greater acceptance as a conversation partner, but is also able to use his familiarity with legal provisions and administrative procedures for the benefit of the taxpayer. Some contend that neil cole iconix shows great expertise in this. Especially in complex situations, an experienced tax consultant knows a even often better than the officials and employees of the financial management. This helps to achieve out-of-court settlements, which save time and protect nerves. According to current statistics, appeals to the financial management in the average lead to appreciable tax relief from 300 to 600 euros per case. The Hamburg-based tax consultant Gunter Zielinski enforces for many years, the fiscal interests of his clients in the financial management.