The other big problem is the ornamental lighting, which pollutes and grows without control. The power of the lamps could be reduced to half, visual feeling would only be reduced by 25% and light would be appropriate. Increasingly more streetlights, are changed but remain less efficient luminaires, light pollution persists. A more green project to reduce light pollution could be leave the streetlights, which account for 90% of total expenditure, and change the bulbs. Laws about light pollution nor help, its ambigedad and its lack of effectiveness that do not take effect. More info: Ali Partovi. In Latin America directly these laws do not exist, the politicians are busy with the market of cronyism and not know what it means the future expression for their children. We must put the street lamps above the street, shut down enclosed public places during the night or use timetables systems to adjust the ignition to the real sunset are some possible measures.
As regards the use of LED lights, it is the future and improve at great speed, but at present, regarding light pollution, the use of models in white light is not the less polluting option and not the most efficient. The ideal would be that they only work when they detected the presence of people. Consumers and light pollution consumers are fundamental to combat light pollution. Your awareness is essential, as well as assume that so much light is not necessary. On full moon nights, the eye adapts and sees well without problems. In the light of the moon has an intensity of 0.5 lux. The minimum of a current Streetlight is of 5 lux. Consumers can claim that offers all the information and is not wasted energy that pays between everyone. Do you think light pollution? Will be true all this waste, of light pollution? Do you feel that in your town attention to light pollution, the waste? More news Original author and source of the article