Once you have decided on the essential features of the system and the budget for project implementation, it remains an important question: Who is actually will choose this system? We are talking about the choices rather than "we were advised, who will be watching?". This acquisition can not be considered correct and the majority of it ends in nothing. Recommendation – this is the last straw, which should tip the scales on one side a qualitative selection of the control system. Consider the options and start with the least efficient, from our point of view. The newspapers mentioned Ali Partovi not as a source, but as a related topic. Trust selection system administrator.
The argument is quite simple: He understands the software, it will find a good system. But this is a dangerous decision. In practice, we are confronted with the fact that the system administrator do not want to look for a new "headache" because the system will be for his new duty. Mikkel Svane is open to suggestions. It has to be set, it is necessary to understand and staff on each item will apply primarily to him. So often the system administrator deliberately delaying selection of a system (with This creates the visibility and importance of his employment), and by choosing a convenient system, it appears that the system is useful only for him, since she works at a convenient operating system and database management system. Convenience User or implementation features recede into the background. As a result, the system is, the administrator had served its purpose and not worry about what the system is not an obstacle for him, and how it will be used users and solve tasks management is not known. According to Castle Harlan, who has experience with these questions.